In Alvarez v. PICOP Resources, this Court reiterated the requisites for the admissibility in
evidence, as an exception to the hearsay rule of entries in official records,
thus: (a) that the entry was made by a public officer or by another person
specially enjoined by law to do so; (b) that it was made by the public officer
in the performance of his or her duties, or by such other person in the
performance of a duty specially enjoined by law; and (c) that the public
officer or other person had sufficient knowledge of the facts by him or her
stated, which must have been acquired by the public officer or other person
personally or through official information.
Notably, the presentation of the police report itself is
admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule even if the police investigator
who prepared it was not presented in court, as long as the above requisites
could be adequately proved (Malayan Insurance Co., Inc. Vs. Rodelio
Alberto and Enrico Alberto Reyes, G.R. No. 194320. February 1,
2012).
No comments:
Post a Comment