As has been consistently held, neither prescription nor laches may render inefficacious a decision in a land registration case. In line with this doctrine of the inapplicability of prescription and laches on registration cases, the Court has ruled that “the failure on the part of the administrative authorities to do their part in the issuance of the decree of registration cannot oust the prevailing party from ownership of the land.” (De Luzuriaga v. Republic, G.R. No. 168848, June 30, 2009)
That the loans were obtained way back in 1991-1992 is of no moment, considering that administrative offenses do not prescribe. (Concerned Lawyers of Bulacan v. Presiding Judge Pornillos, A.M. No. RTJ-09-2183, July 7, 2009)
That the loans were obtained way back in 1991-1992 is of no moment, considering that administrative offenses do not prescribe. (Concerned Lawyers of Bulacan v. Presiding Judge Pornillos, A.M. No. RTJ-09-2183, July 7, 2009)
No comments:
Post a Comment